Designing a Nexus Curriculum Model (Research-Teaching Nexus) for the Humanities Major in higher education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Curriculum Studies, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Department of Education, Faculty of Education& Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Department of Education, Faculty of Education& Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract
Objective: The present study was conducted with the aim of designing a Nexus-curricular model for the major group of humanities. Curriculum in higher education can act as a bridge between the macro-level of decision-making and the micro-level.E
Method: In the present study, a qualitative approach and a research synthesis method were used to explain the curriculum elements. The statistical population included upstream documents, books, articles, dissertations, and theses related to the period from 1995 to 2025. After content analysis and axial and selective coding of the data obtained from the document review, the initial characteristics of the Nexus curriculum elements were extracted and then interviews were conducted with relevant experts and professors, and their opinions were used to modify the proposed model, and the final model was presented. MAXQDA2020 software was used to analyze the content of the documents and interviews.
Results: According to the findings from the content analysis of documents and interviews, in this model, 52 core codes and 11 optional codes were identified, including accepting the temporary and variable nature of knowledge, relating course content to new research findings, promoting a national research culture, etc., which indicated the characteristics and elements of the Nexus Curriculum.
Conclusions: Reforms should be made in higher education curriculum to facilitate the practical use of Nexus curricula in higher education. Also, the most effective factor in designing and implementing Nexus curriculum was the university's support for professors and research students.

Keywords

Subjects

آتشی، ف.،گلستانی، ه.، و شمشیری، م. (1399). کاربرد دلالت های فلسفی و تربیتی جان دیوئی برای مدیران آموزشی. رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 11(3)، 348- 333.  https://sid.ir/paper/999077/fa
ابراهیمی تیرتاش، ف.، و شیخ رضایی، ح. (1395). حلقه کندوکاو و قابلیت های آن در تدریس ماهیت علم.‎ تفکر و کودک، 7(1)، 23- 1. https://fabak.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2536_0.html?lang=fa
اربابی‌فر، ف.، و ناظر دیلمی، س. (1400). تدریس درس فیزیک جدید به دانشجویان با رویکرد مبتنی بر استفاده از ماهیت علم. پژوهش در آموزش علوم تجربی، 1(1)، 34-27. https://sid.ir/paper/951699/fa  
برقی، ا.، و قهرمانی، ل. (1404). بررسی عوامل روانشناختی پیش‌بینی‌کننده در استفاده معلمان از رویکرد پژوهشی در تدریس در ناحیه 2 شهر تبریز. تدریس پژوهی، (در دست انتشار). https://doi.org/10.22034/trj.2025.142982.2139
توکلی یرکی، ر.، عارفی، م.، جعفری، ا.، خادمی، م. (1404). بررسی مشارکت دانشجویان در آموزش عالی ایران (فراترکیب). پژوهش نامه آموزش عالی، 17(66)، 20-1.‎ https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2025.523730.3320
خورشیدی، غ.، و پیشگاهی، ش. (1391). پیش نیازها و موانع تحقق توسعه علوم انسانی میان رشته ای. فصلنامه مطالعات میان رشته ای در علوم انسانی، 4(2)، 15-1.‎ https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n3  
رشیدی، ز. (1404). ارائه چهارچوب مفهومی آموزش پژوهش محور در نظام آموزش عالی ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ریزی در آموزش عالی، 31(1)، 59-39.‎ https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.1.3 
زاهدی، ن. (1403). راهنمای تدوین مقاله کامل اهمیت آموزش عملی همراه با پژوهش در بهبود کیفیت تدریس علوم تجربی در متوسطه اول. همایش ملی پژوهش های نوین در اقدام پژوهی راه کارها و پیشنهادات، 2، 635-630.‎ https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/articlepage/2253211
طالبی، ف.، و جاهد، ح.، و ساری خانی، ن. (1401). مولفه ها و شاخص‌های ارتقاء کیفیت پژوهش در نظام آموزش عالی ایران. خط مشی‌گذاری عمومی در مدیریت، 12 (14)، 162-147.‎ https://www.sid.ir/paper/409835/fa
کرمی، ز. (1404). ارائه چارچوبی مفهومی برای طراحی برنامه درسی مبتنی بر آینده. مطالعات سیاست گذاری تربیت معلم، 6(4)، 52-29 . https://doi.org/10.48310/edup.2024.15603.1403 
مهرمحمدی، م.، موسی پور، ن.، و کیذوری، ا. (1397). تأملی بر گزینه های سیاستی توسعه برنامه های میان رشته ای علوم انسانی در آموزش عالی ایران.‎ مطالعات برنامه‏درسی در آموزش عالی، 9(17)، 35-7. https://sid.ir/paper/219540/fa  
یاراحمدیان، م.،  نیازی‌میرکی، ‌آ.، حسینی، ر.، و فراهانی‌آهنگرانی، ف. (1403). کاربردهای هوش مصنوعی در ارزیابی و برنامه ریزی تحصیلی. تحقیقات راهبردی در تعلیم و آموزش و پرورش، 2، 551-533.‎ https://civilica.com/doc/1839496
یونسی، ا.، عباسی، ع.، حسینی خواه، ع.، و خنیفر، ح. (1401). شناسایی شایستگی ها و راهبردهای بالندگی اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان در ارتباط با برنامه درسی: یک مطالعه کیفی.  پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، 16(56)، 33-22. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23831324.1401.16.56.2.9 
Arbabifar, F. and Nazerdeylami, S. (2021). Teaching Modern Physics Based on Nature of Science Approach. Research in Experimental Science Education, 1(1), 27-34. https://sid.ir/paper/951699/fa (in Persian)
Arimoto, A. (2015). The teaching-research nexus from an international perspective in W. k. commings, and U. teacher (Eds). The relevance of academic world in comparative perspective, pp.(91-106), Dordrecht, Springer Science and Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11767-6_6
Arkoh, E. A., Aboagye, G. K., Atta–Kwenin, I., & Jehu-Appiah, J. (2022). Conceptualizing the scholarship of teaching and learning within the context of the research--teaching Nexus in higher education. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(6), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.7176/RHSS/12-6-02 
Atashi, F., Golestani, H., and Shamshiri, M. (2019). Application of John Dewey's Philosophical and Educational Implications for Educational Managers. New Approaches to Educational Management, 11(3), 333-348. https://sid.ir/paper/999077/fa (in Persian)
Ayoola, A. B., Adams, Y. J., Kamp, K. J., Zandee, G. L., Feenstra, C., & Doornbos, M. M. (2017). Promoting the future of nursing by increasing zest for research in under-graduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.011
Bargi, A., & Ghahremani, L. (in press). Investigating the predictive psychological factors in teachers' use of research approach in teaching in district 2 of Tabriz city. Teaching Research.  https://doi.org/10.22034/trj.2025.142982.2139  (in Persian)
Brew, A. (2012). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903552451
Butson, R., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2024). AI and its implications for research in higher education: a critical dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 563-577. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2280200
Cao, Y., Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Toom, A. (2023). A survey research on Finnish teacher educators’ research-teaching integration and its relationship with their approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(1), 171‒198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900111
Caragea, I., Țițan, E., Tănase, A., & Perța, E. I. (2025). The importance of curriculum design in workforce absorption: A bibliometric analysis of trends in higher education. In EDULEARN25 Proceedings (pp. 8261-8267). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2025.2118
Carnell, B., & Fung, D. (Eds.). (2017). Developing the higher education curriculum: Research-based education in practice. UCL Press. 
Ebrahimi Tirtash, F., & Sheikh Rezaei, H. (2016). The circle of inquiry and its capabilities in teaching the nature of science. Thinking and the Child, 7(1), 1-23. https://fabak.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2536_0.html?lang=fa  (in Persian)
Engelhardt-Nowitzki, C., Aburaia, M., Otrebski, R., Rauer, J., & Orsolits, H. (2020). Research- based teaching in digital manufacturing and robotics–the digital factory at the UAS Technikum Wien as a case example. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.089
Geschwind, L., & Broström, A. (2015). Managing the teaching‒research nexus: Ideals and practice in research-oriented universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 60‒73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934332
Harrison, L. M., Woods, R. J., McCarthy, M. C., & Parikh, P. P. (2020). Development and implementation of a sustainable research curriculum for general surgery residents: a foundation for developing a research culture. The American Journal of Surgery, 220(1), 105-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.028
Healey, M., Jordan, F., Pell, B., & Short, C. (2010). The research–teaching nexus: a case study of students' awareness, experiences and perceptions of research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47 (2), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703291003718968
Hedayati, A., Maleki, H., Sadeghi, A., & Saadipour, A. (2017). Design and validation of a competency-based curriculum model for a master's degree in curriculum. Qualitative Research in Curriculum, 1(4), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.22054/qric.2016.7494 (in persian)
Howell, K. (2021). Enhancing research and scholarly experiences based on students’ awareness and perception of the research-teaching nexus: A student-centered approach. Plos one, 16(9), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257799   
Hughes, G. (2019). Developing student research capability for a ‘post-truth’world: Three challenges for integrating research across taught programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 394-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1541173
Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2009). Developing the student as a researcher through the curriculum. Innovations in practice, 2(1), 3-15. .https://assets.pubpub.org/9volmfju/31584971599208.pdf
Jusho & Abidin, R., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2017). Students’ Awareness, Experiences and Perceptions on Teaching-Research Nexus. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 2 (2), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v2i2.184
Karami, Z. (1404). Providing a conceptual framework for designing a future-oriented curriculum. Policy Studies in Teacher Education, 6(4), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.48310/edup.2024.15603.1403 (in Persian)
Khorshidi, Gh., & Pishgahi, Sh. (2012). Capacities and obstacles to the development of interdisciplinary humanities. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4, 2, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n3(in Persian)
Kyaw, M. T. (2023). Teaching-research Nexus of teacher educators in Myanmar. Perceptions and Practices, 4, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103680
Lederman, N. G. (2013). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 845-894). Routledge.eaching in Higher Education, 10(3), 387-394. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75417
Leite, C., Marinho, P., & Sousa-Pereira, F. (2023). Academic perspectives of the teaching-research nexus in initial teacher education in Portugal (SCOPUS Q1 / JCR Q1). Education XX1, 26, 71‒91. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.31518
Li, Y., Li, D., Yang, W., & Li, H. (2020). Negotiating the teaching-research nexus: A case of classroom teaching in a MEd Program. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55(1), 181‒196. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.31518
Macheridis, N., Pihl, A. F., Paulsson, A., & Pihl, H. (2024). Students’ experiences of the research-teaching nexus. Tertiary Education and Management, 30(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-023-09129-8
McKenzie, A., Griggs, L., Snell, R., & Meyers, G. D. (2018). The myth of the teaching-research nexus. Legal Educ. Rev, 28 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6312
McLinden, M., Edwards, C., Garfield, J., & Moron-Garcia, S. (2015). Strengthening the links between research and teaching: cultivating student expectations of research-informed teaching approaches. Education in Practice, 2 (1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1xhr542.7
Mehrmohammadi,M. , musapoor,N. and Kayzouri,A. H. (2018). A Review over the Policy Options for Development of Interdisciplinary Programs in the Humanities in Iran. Journal of higher education curriculum studies, 9(17), 7-35. https://sid.ir/paper/219540/fa (in Persian)
Raelin, J.A. 2007. Toward an epistemology of practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education 6, no. 4: 495–519. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2007.27694950
Rashidi, Z. (1403). The conceptual framework for research-based education in the Iranian higher education system. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 31(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.61838/KMAN.IRPHE.31.1.3  (in Persian)
Reid, J. W., & Gardner, G. E. (2020). Navigating Tensions of Research and Teaching: Biology Graduate Students’ Perceptions of the Research–Teaching Nexus within Ecological Contexts. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19 (3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0218
Spronken-Smith, R., Walker, R., Batchelor, J., O’Steen, B. & Angelo, T. (2012). Evaluating student perceptions of learning processes and intended learning outcomes under inquiry approaches. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher education, 37 (1): 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.496531
Talebi, Fahimeh; Jahed, Hossein Ali and Sarikhani, Nahid (2011). Components and indicators of research quality improvement in the Iranian higher education system. Public Administration Mission, 12 (14): 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2011.564995 (in Persian)
Tavakoli Yaraki,R. , Arefi,M. , Jafari,E. and Khademi,M. (2024). Investigating Students' participation in Iran's Higher Education (Metasynthesis). (e716060). Higher Education Letter, 17(66), https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2025.523730.3320(in Persian)
Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research/teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293‒311. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2016.1224674
Uaciquete, A. S., & Valcke, M. (2022). Strengthening the teaching and research nexus (TRN) in Higher Education (HE): Systematic review of reviews. Sustainability, 14(22), Article 22 https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215317
Visser‐Wijnveen, G. J., Van Driel, J. H., Van der Rijst, R. M., Verloop, N., & Visser, A. (2010). The ideal research‐teaching nexus in the eyes of academics: building profiles. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903532016
Wallace, D., Lennon, O., King, J., & Doran, P. (2018). The Research-teaching nexus as a curriculum development tool in a graduate taught program. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v10i3.367
Weenink, K., Aarts, N., & Jacobs, S. (2024). ‘I need a grant but spend time on teaching’: how academics in different positions play out the teaching–research nexus in interdependence with their contexts. European journal of higher education, 14(3), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2221839
Yarahmadian, M., Niazi Mirki, A., Hosseini, R., and Farahani Ahangarani, F. (2014). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Assessment and Planning. Strategic Research in Education, 2, 533-551. https://en.civilica.com/doc/1839496/ (in Persian)
Younesi, A., Abbasi, Effat, Hosseinikhah, A., and Khneifer, H. (2014). Identifying the competencies and development strategies of Farhangian University faculty members in relation to the curriculum: A qualitative study. Research in Educational Systems, 16(56), 22-33. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23831324.1401.16.56.2.9  (in Persian)
Zahedi, N. (1403). Guide to writing a complete article on the importance of practical training combined with research in improving the quality of teaching experimental sciences in junior high school. National Conference on Modern Research in Action Research, Solutions and Suggestions, 2, 630-635. https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/articlepage/2253211 (in Persian)