انیسی، جعفر. (1390). بررسی اعتبار و روایی فرم کوتاه پرسشنامه پنج عاملی نئو در دانشجویان. مجله علوم رفتاری، 5(4)، 351-355.
محمودیان، حسن، دلاور، علی، فرخی، نورعلی، و برجعلی، احمد. (1396). مقایسۀ رابطۀ ویژگیهای شخصیتی و مطلوبیت اجتماعی در دانشجویان با پاسخهای وانمود و صادقانه. پژوهش در نظامهای آموزشی، 11(37)، 229-242.doi: 10.22034/jiera.2017.57773
همبلتون، رونالد. ک، سوامیناتان. اچ و راجرز، اچ. جین. (1991). مبانی نظریه سؤال ـ پاسخ. ترجمه محمدرضا فلسفینژاد. (1389). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
References
Anisi, J. (2013). Investigating the validity and reliability of the short form of the five-factor NEO questionnaire in students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 351-355. [In Persian]
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261-272.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
Edwards, A. E. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.
Eid, M., & Rauber, M. (2000). Detecting measurement invariance in organizational surveys. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 20-30.
Eid, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2007). Detecting response styles and faking in personality and organizational assessments by mixed Rasch models. In M. von Davier & C. H. Carstenen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models (pp. 255–270). New York: Springer.
Gangestad, S., & Snyder, M. (1985). To carve nature at its joints: On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317-349.
Hambleton, Ronald K, Swaminathan. H. & Rogers, H. Jane (1991). Basics of item response theory. Translated by Mohammad Reza Filasfinejad. (2010). Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University Press. [In Persian]
Heggestad, E. D., George, E., & Reeve, C. L. (2006). Transient error in personality scores: Considering honest and faked responses. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1201–1211.
Hendy, N., Krammer, G., Schermer, J. A., & Biderman, M. D. (2021). Using bifactor models to identify faking on Big Five questionnaires. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 29(1), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12316
Holden, R. R. (2006, April). Faking on noncognitive self-report: Seven primary questions. In Paper presented to the educational testing services (ETS) external technical advisory group (TAG) conference on faking in non-cognitive assessment. Princeton, NJ.
Holden, R. R. (2007). Socially desirable responding does moderate scale validity both in experimental and in nonexperimental contexts. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39, 184–201.
Holden, R. R. (2008). Underestimating the effects of faking on the validity of selfreport personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 311–321.
Holden, R. R., & Book, A.S. (2011). Faking does distort self report personality assessment. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, and R. D. Roberts (Eds.) New perspectives on faking in personality.
Holden, R. R., & Passey, J. (2009). Social desirability. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York: Guilford.
Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11, 209–244.
Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCoy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2006). The selfreport assessment of psychopathy: Problems, pitfalls, and promisses. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of Psychopathy (pp. 107-132). New York: Guilford Press
Liu, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). An item-level analysis for detecting faking on personality tests: Appropriateness of ideal point item response theory models. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03090
Mahmoudian, H., Delavar, A., Farrokhi, N., Borjali, A. (2016). Comparing the relationship between personality traits and social desirability in students with fake and honest answers. Research in Educational Systems, 11(37), 229-242. doi: 10.22034/jiera.2017.57773 [In Persian]
Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812–821.
Monaro, M., Mazza, C., Colasanti, M., Ferracuti, S., Orrù, G., Di Domenico, A., ... & Roma, P. (2021). Detecting faking-good response style in personality questionnaires with four choice alternatives. Psychological Research, 1-14. doi: 10.1007/S00426-020-01473-3
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection. Human Performance, 11, 245–269.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–679.
Pauls, C. A., & Crost, N. W. (2005). Effects of different instructional sets on the construct validity of the NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 297–308.
Plieninger, H. (2017). Mountain or molehill? A simulation study on the impact of response styles. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(1), 32-53. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013164416636655
Purpura, A., Giorgianni, D., Orrù, G., Melis, G., & Sartori, G. (2022). Identifying single-item faked responses in personality tests: A new TF-IDF-based method. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272970
Reise, S. P. & Widaman, K. F. (1999). Assessing the fit of measurement models at the individual level: A comparison of item response theory and covariance structure approaches. Psychological Methods, 4, 3-21.
Reise, S. P., & Gomel, J. N. (1995). Modeling qualitative variation within latent trait dimensions: Application of mixed-measurement to personality assessment. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 341-358
Robie, C., Zickar, M. J., & Schmit, M. J. (2001). Measurement equivalence between applicant and incumbent groups: An IRT analysis of personality scales. Human Performance, 14, 187-207.
Ronald, R., Holden., Zdravko, Marjanovic. (2021). Faking on a self-report personality inventory: Indiscriminate, discriminate, or hyper-discriminate responding?. Personality and Individual Differences, doi: 10.1016/J.PAID.2019.109768
Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & von Davier, M. (1997). Applying the mixed Rasch model to personality questionnaires. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 324-332). New York: Waxmann
Şahin, İ., & Yalçın, S. (2024). Comparison of cluster analysis and latent class analysis for the detection of fake responses on personality tests. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 15(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1327395
Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966–974.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
Von Davier, M. (2001). WINMIRA 2001. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education.
von Davier, M., & Rost, J. (1997). Self monitoring – A class variable? In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 296–305). New York: Waxmann.
Zickar, M. J., & Gibby, R. E. (2006). A history of faking and socially desirable responding on personality tests. In R. L. Griffith & M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior (pp. 21–42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Zickar, M. J., & Robie, C. (1999). Modeling faking good on personality items: An item-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 551–563
Zickar, M. J., & Sliter, K. A. (2011). Searching for unicorns: Item response theory-based solutions to the faking problem. In M. Ziegler, C. MacCann, and R. D. Roberts (Eds.) New
Zickar, M. J., & Ury, K. L. (2002). Developing an interpretation of item parameters for personality items: Content correlates of parameter estimates. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 62(1), 19-31.
Zickar, M. J., Gibby, R. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Uncovering Faking Samples in Applicant, Incumbent, and Experimental Data Sets: An Application of Mixed-Model Item Response Theory. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263674
Ziegler, M., & Buehner, M. (2009). Modeling socially desirable responding and its effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 548–565.
Ziegler, M., Toomela, A., & Buehner, M. (2009). A reanalysis of Toomela (2003): Spurious measurement error as cause for common variance between personality factors. Psychology.
Ziegler, M., Toomela, A., & Buehner, M. (2009). A reanalysis of Toomela (2003): Spurious measurement error as cause for common variance between personality factors. Psychology.
