Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Educational Technology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Computer Dept., Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Determining the position and importance of scientific groups in the operational structure of the university and its important role in improving the quality of educational and research activities of the university's affiliated faculties is one of the important issues for universities. Some universities have provided simple models for classifying scientific group, but there is still no coherent and complete system for ranking scientific groups in universities. The main purpose of this study was to provide a suitable model for ranking scientific groups in universities and higher education centers in the country. In this qualitative research, the methods of qualitative content analysis and semi-structured interviews were used. Qualitative content analysis was done inductively and semi-structured interviews were conducted with research participants on the topic and how to rate and rank categories and subcategories. To analyze the data obtained from semi-structured interviews, interpretive analysis method was used and finally the components of the model and their scores were extracted. Mission, goals, organizational position; training courses and curricula and non-curricula; science Committee; Students; Learning / teaching strategies; educational facilities and equipment; theses and dissertations, seminars, research contracts of chairs and graduates were components of the ranking model of scientific group in Iranian universities and higher education centers.The results of this ranking model can be used for all scientific groups and fields of study. It will also be useful to develop this model in the form of a mechanized system for different uses such as comparing academic departments in universities and leveling faculties.

Keywords

ریگی، ع.، عزیزی، ن. و پورقاز، ع. (1399). تحلیل انتقادی عوامل برون دانشگاهی مؤثر بر رتبه جهانی دانشگاه‌های ایران. پژوهش در نظام‏های آموزشی، 14 (49)، 91-109. doi: 10.22034/jiera.2020.205908.2108
صفری‏فارفار، ر.، ابوالقاسمی، م.، فراست‏خواه، م. و نوه‏ابراهیم، ع. (1397). طراحی چهارچوب مفهومی برای رتبه‏بندی گروه‏های آموزشی دانشگاه‏های دولتی ایران. مطالعات اندازه‏گیری و ارزشیابی آموزشی، 8 (21)، 191-225.
عباسی، ب. (1399). شناسایی و رتبه‏بندی معیارهای ارزیابی عملکرد رقابتی دانشگاه‏ها با استفاده از تکنیک‏های تصمیم‏گیری چند معیاره. پژوهش در نظام‏های آموزشی، 14 (ویژه‏نامه)، 609-636.  doi: 10.22034/JIERA.2020.192505.1937
Abasi, B. (2020). Identifying and Ranking of Competitive Performance Evaluation Criteria of Universities Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques, Journal of Research in Educational Science, 14(Special Issue), 609-636. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22034/JIERA.2020.192505.1937
Allameh Tabataba’i University, Ranking Educational Group, http://www.atu.ac.ir
Almgren, E. (2009). Ranking of university and higher education institutions for student information purposes? Stokholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education.
Amol University of Paramedical Medicine paramed, Ranking Educational Group, http://amol.mazums.ac.ir
Asareh. F., Afifian, F., & Noor Mohammadi, H. A. (2019). Designing a Conceptual and Operational Model for the Evaluation and Scientific Ranking of Humanities Departments in Iranian Universities and Higher Education Institutions, Journal of Pajoohesh Nameh Elmsanji, 5(9), 23-46. [In Persian].
Boulton, G. (2011). University Rankings: Diversity, Excellence and the European Initiative, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 13, 74-102.
Drucker, P. F. (1998). From capitalism to knowledge society in the knowledge economy. In D. Neef (Ed.), Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2007). The Qualitative Content Analysis Process, Journal Compilation, 22, 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Erkkilä, T. (2014). Global University Rankings, Transnational Policy Discourse and Higher Education in Europe, European Journal of Education, 49(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12063
Esmaeili, Z., & Rezaeian, S. A. (2016). Evaluation of the Performance of Educational Groups of Farhangian University, Province of Guilan, Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Prioritization Based on the AHP Model, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(4), 116-120. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0165-4
Fahriye, U. (2015). Evaluation of the Factors That Determine Quality in Graduate Education: Application of a Satisfaction Benchmarking Approach, Procedia Social and Behavioral Scienses, 191, 1034-1037. doi:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.04.386
Hill, K. (2006). Universities in the U.S national innovation system. Arizona State University.
Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2004). Universities in national innovation system. Oxford University Press.
Provan, D., & Abercropmby. K. (2010). University league tables and rankings: A critical analysis. Colombia: CHEMS.
Rigi, A., azizi, N., purghaz, A. (2020). A Critical Analysis of External Factors Affecting World Rankings of Iranian Universities, Journal of Research in Educational Science, 14(49), 91-109. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22034/jiera.2020.205908.2108
Safari Farfar, R., Abolghasemi, M., Farastkhah, M., & Naveh Ebrahim, A. (2018). Designing a Conceptual Framework for Ranking Departments of Iranian Public Universities, Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 8(21), 191-225. [In Persian].
Serban, O. G., & Mihilescu, N. (2015). The Usage of Benchmarking as a Specific Management Method Within the Experimental Research at University Sport Club, Procedia Social and Behavioral Scienses, 180, 1330-1335.
Shin, J. C., Toutkoushian, R. K., & Teichler, U. (2011). University ranking: Teoretical bases, methodoligy, and impacts on global higher education. London: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7
Usher, A., & Savino, M. (2007). A Global Survey of Rankings and League Tables, College and University Ranking Systems, 23. doi:10.1080/03797720701618831