Journal of Research in Educational Systems
Scientific Journal

University-Based Design Principles of Open spaces Creative Vitality and Social Interaction

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

saeed azemati 1
farhang mozaffar 2
seyed bagher hosseini 3
bahram saleh sedgh pour 4

1 isfahan art university

2 Professor of Architecture, Iran University of Science and Technology Creativity and Educational Space

3 Professor of Architecture, Iran University of Science and Technology

4 associate Prof. Shahid Rajaie Teacher Training University education

https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2017.57771
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to provide principles for designing Open University spaces based on increasing creative vitality and social interactions. In this research, the method of quantitative qualitative research has been used. The population of this study was architecture and urban planners. It was obtained through a network sampling (snowball) and sample size through theoretical saturation that was extracted from the factors. Also, after an open interview, experts and experts used open and axial encoding techniques. Using Delphi explorative scanning method, 20 faculty members of the university architecture and urban planning department in Tehran, and then the results were included in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed in two stages. To analyze the data collected based on factor analysis, the results of extraction are extracted, and finally the most influential factors are identified on the creative vitality process and social interactions of each of the spatial attributes. The results of this research indicate that social, physical, design and psychological dimensions of the environment are influential on Open University faculties.

Keywords

Design principles
public spaces
Creative vitality
Social Interaction
ادواردز، برایان. (1386). معماری دانشگاه، ترجمه حمیدرضا عظمتی، محمد باقری، تهران: انتشارات هنر و معماری.
پاک‌نژاد، جهانشاه. (1384). راهنمای طراحی فضاهای شهری در ایران، وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی، معاونت شهرسازی و معماری.
جلالی، رستم. (1391). نمونه‌گیری در پژوهش‌های کیفی. نشریه تحقیقات کیفی در علوم سلامت، 1(4)، 320-310.
دانشپور، سید عبدالهادی و چرخچیان، مریم. (1386). فضای عمومی و عوامل مؤثر بر حیات جمعی، مجله علمی پژوهشی باغ نظر، 4(7)، 28-19.
رعیتی، مهرانه. (1395). تبیین معیارهای طراحانه زمین‌بازی پارک‌های شهری از منظر سرزندگی کودک، رساله‌ی دکترا دانشگاه. علم و صنعت، تهران.
کوکبی، افشین؛ پورجعفر، محمدرضا و تقوایی، علی‌اکبر. (1391). معیارهای ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی شهری در مراکز شهری. مجله هویت شهر، ج1، 13،13-6.
لنگ، جان. (1383). آفرینش نظریه معماری، نقش علوم رفتاری در طراحی محیط، ترجمه علیرضا عینی فر، چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
نوروزیان ملکی، سعید. (1392). معیارهای طراحانه ارتقای سرزندگی محلات مسکونی. (واحد همسایگی بانشاط و سرزنده). رساله­ی دکترا دانشگاه. علم و صنعت، تهران.
Altman, I. (1993). Dialectics, Physical Environments,and Personal Relationships. Communication Monographs, 60, 26-34.
Carmona, M. (1999). Review: Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris and Tridib Banerjee (1998) Urban Design Downtown - Poetics and Politics of Form, Berkeley, University of California Press. Built Environment, 25(1), 81-82.
Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G. & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Dunnet, N., Swanwick, C., & Woolley, H. (2002). Improving Urban Parks, Play Areas and Green Spaces. Dep. Landsc. University of Sheffield.
Gehl architects. (1987), Public Space and Public Life Study, http,//www.gehlarchitects.dk/index.htm -Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open spaces in residential land use. land use policy, 19, 91-98.
Hajer, M. & Rijendorp, A. (2001), In Search of the New Public Domain, Analysis and Strategy. Rotterdam, NAi Publishers.
Hoffman, F., & Gardner, R. (1983). Evaluation of uncertainties in environmental radiological assessment models. In J. Till & H. Meyer (Eds.), Radiological assessments, A textbook on environmental dose assessment. Washington DC.
Hsu, D. T., Sanford, B. J., Meyers, K. K., Love, T. M., Hazlett, K. E., Wang, H., ... & Koeppe, R. A. (2013). Response of the μ-opioid system to social rejection and acceptance. Molecular psychiatry, 18(11), 1211-1217.
Lansing, J. B., & Marans, R. W. (1969). Evaluation of neighborhood quality. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(3), 195-199.
Lennard, S. H. C., & Lennard, H. L. (1984). Public life in urban places: social and architectural characteristics conducive to public life in European cities. Gondolier PressImcl Council.
Lennard, S. H. C., & Lennard, H. L. (1993). Public life in urban places: social and architectural characteristics conducive to public life in European cities. Gondolier PressImcl Council.
Leslie, E., Saelens, B., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Coffee, N., & Hugo, G. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. Health & place, 11(3), 227-236.
Little, B. R. (1983). Personal projects, A rationale and method for investigation. Environment and Behavior, 15, 273-309.
Lyndhurst, B. (2004) Liveability & Sustainable Development, Bad Habits & Hard Choices. London, Final Report for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Ozguner, H., & Kendle, A. D. (2006). Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landsc. Urban Plan, 74,139-157.
Peet, R. (1985). The Social Origins of Environmental Determinism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 75(3), 309-333.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of environmental psychology, 3(1), 57-83.
Smith, T., Nelischer, M. & Perkins, N. (1997). Quality of an urban community, a framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 39, (2-3), pp. 229-241.
Thiel, P. (1997). People, Paths and Purposes, Notations for a Participatmy Envirotecture. Seattle and London, University of Washington Press.
Van-Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G. & de-Hollander, A. (2003) Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, (1-2), pp. 5-18.
Journal of Research in Educational Systems
Volume 11, Issue 37
Autumn 2017
Pages 179-200

Home

Editorial Boards

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us