Developing and Validating a Model for Reducing Family Illiteracy Based on Student Capacity: Experts' Perspectives

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Sa. C., Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Department of Educational Governance and Human Resources, Sa.C., Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.

Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to design and validate a conceptual model for reducing illiteracy within the family by drawing on the capacity of students, from the perspective of experts.
Method: The study adopted a qualitative approach grounded in the Straussian version of grounded theory, situated within an interpretive-constructivist philosophical framework. Participants comprised 20 educational experts (teachers, university faculty, and Literacy Movement specialists) in Kurdistan province, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews until theoretical saturation was reached, and were analyzed through the three-stage process of open, axial, and selective coding. The trustworthiness of the findings was established using Lincoln and Guba's four criteria, and reliability was confirmed through inter-coder agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient (mean = 0.82). Content validity was further established by computing the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI), both exceeding the critical threshold of 0.59.
Results: The findings led to the formation of a conceptual model comprising five main dimensions (causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences). The core category identified was “strengthening within-family learning capacities.”
Conclusions: The proposed model offers a practical, context-specific framework grounded in experts' experience for intervening in family illiteracy. Accordingly, its use is recommended as a low-cost and effective complement to formal literacy program.

Keywords

Subjects

بابایی، م.، عزیزیان، ک.، و زارع، ا. (۱۴۰۲). تحلیل چالش‌های آموزش در نهضت سوادآموزی از منظر معلمان. پژوهش‌های آموزش و یادگیری، ۱۸(۲)، 35-50.  https://tlr.shahed.ac.ir/article_4005.html
حسنی، ر. (۱۳۹۹). تحلیلی بر آموزش بزرگ‌سالان: تعیین نرخ پایداری سواد. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های یاددهی و یادگیری، ۱۶(۶۵)، 93-108. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/939934
عسکری، ف.، و حکیم‌زاده، ر. (۱۴۰۰). مطالعه تطبیقی برنامه‌های درسی مرتبط باسواد خواندن و نوشتن. نشریه پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، ۱۵(۵۳)، 150- 162.  https://www.jiera.ir/article_144520.html
مرعشی، س. م.، و سالمی، م. (۱۴۰۱). ارزشیابی طرح حلقه‌های کتاب‌خوانی سوادآموزان نهضت سوادآموزی استان خوزستان بر اساس الگوی سیپ. پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، ۱۲(۱)، 186-204. https://civilica.com/doc/1480379
مرکز آمار ایران (۱۴۰۰). نتایج سرشماری نفوس و مسکن ۱۴۰۰. تهران: مرکز آمار ایران. https://www.amar.org.ir 
Al-Maadadi, F., Ihmeideh, F., Al-Falasi, M., Coughlin, C., & Al-Thani, T. (2017). Family literacy programs in Qatar. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 283-296. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Family-Literacy-Programs-in-Qatar%3A-Teachers%27-and-Al-Maadadi-Ihmeideh/6f6b0a0e5b5c5f5e5b5c5f5e5b5c5f5e5b5c5f5e
Askari, F., & Hakimzadeh, R. (2021). A comparative study of curricula related to reading and writing literacy. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 15(53), 150-162. https://www.jiera.ir/article_144520.html (in Persian)
Babaei, M, Azizian, K, & Zare, A. (2023). Analysis of educational challenges in the literacy movement from teachers' perspective. Educational and Learning Research, 18(2), 35-50. https://tlr.shahed.ac.ir/article_4005.html (in Persian)
Clymer, C, Lee, J, McLean, E. L, & Prins, E. (2024). Parents' learning in family literacy: A mixed-methods evaluation. Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung, 47(2), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40955-024-00278-4
Dahl-Leonard, K., Hall, C., Cho, E., Capin, P., Roberts, G. J., Kehoe, K. F., Haring, C., Peacott, D., & Demchak, A. (2025). Examining the effects of family-implemented literacy interventions for school-aged children: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 10, 1-34. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10648-025-09985-3.pdf
Edwards, P. A, Smith, P, & McNair, J. C. (2023). Toward culturally relevant literacies with children and families of color. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed, pp. 180-197). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.07033-0
García-Carrión, R, Villardón-Gallego, L, Martínez-de-la-Hidalga, Z., & Marauri, J. (2023). Family involvement in education and academic achievement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 93(4), 521-558. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221144675
Hassani, R. (2020). An analysis of adult education: Determining the literacy retention rate. Educational Researches, 16(65), 93-108. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/939934 (in Persian)
Katiyar, S. P. (2022). Adult illiteracy: A global social problem. In R. Baikady et al. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_160-1
Lavert, G. B., & Bellanca, J. A. (2025). Who says I can't? A four-year plan to erase the reading gap and achieve proficiency by fourth grade. Solution Tree Press. https://www.solutiontree.com/who-says-i-can-t.html
Maraashi, S. M, & Salemi, M. (2022). Evaluation of the book reading circles plan for literacy learners of the Literacy Movement Organization in Khuzestan province based on the CIPP model. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12(1), 186-204. https://civilica.com/doc/1480379 (in Persian)
Martinez, M. (2022). Dimensions of illiteracy: A quantitative and comparative approach from Italy, circa 1815 (No. 2022/28). LEM Working Paper Series. 2022/28, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy. https://www.lem.sssup.it/WPLem/files/2022-28.pdf
Prins, E., & Zholdoshalieva, R. (2025). Family and intergenerational literacy and learning: International perspectives.  International Review of Education, 72, 553–556 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-025-10199-6
Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/uk/educators/higher-education-educators/program/Saunders-Research-Methods-for-Business-Students-8th-Edition/PGM0000000.html
Schmeiduch, L., & Thevenot, E. (2025). Lifelong learning in sustainability-led initiatives: Exploring their learning potential along the reworked four pillars of education. International Review of Education, 72, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-024-10122-5
Statistical Centre of Iran. (2021). Results of the Population and Housing Census 2021. Tehran: Statistical Centre of Iran. (in Persian)
UNESCO. (2024). Education & literacy: Literacy. http://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/literacy
Vágvölgyi, R., Bergström, K., Bulajić, A., Klatte, M., Fernandes, T., Grosche, M., Huettig, F., Rüsseler, J., & Lachmann, T. (2021). Functional illiteracy and developmental dyslexia: Looking for common roots. A systematic review. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 5(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-021-00074-9