Providing an Integrated Model of Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in Primary Education

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Philosophy and Logic Education, Farhangian University,Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Objective: This study was conducted with the aim of providing an integrated model of Philosophy for Children (P4C) and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in primary education.
Method: In terms of purpose, this study is applied, and in terms of approach, it is qualitative and of the thematic analysis type. The statistical population consisted of experts and specialists in the fields of philosophy, pedagogical content knowledge, and curriculum planning in the years 2024-2025. Using purposive sampling and the snowball technique, 18 individuals (15 professors and 3 curriculum planners) were selected. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis with inter-coder agreement (reliability coefficient of 0.78).
Results: Data analysis led to the extraction of 33 basic themes, 11 organizing themes, and ultimately 6 overarching themes as the main dimensions of the model. The identified organizing themes were: basic cognitive skills, mental readiness, content comprehension, content design skills, communication skills, interaction skills, analysis and judgment, problem-solving, concept linking, self-regulation, and knowledge of educational tools. These components were organized within a comprehensive integrated model.
Conclusion: The findings showed that the purposeful integration of the two approaches, P4C and PCK, can provide an effective conceptual framework for designing primary education curricula. This model, by simultaneously enhancing philosophical thinking skills (such as analysis and judgment) and content-focused teaching competencies (such as understanding and designing content), provides an effective framework for designing primary education curricula.





This study adopts a qualitative and applied research design employing the Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology. Data were collected through document analysis, theoretical framework review, and semi-structured interviews with 10 experts in the field of education. Thematic analysis was used to examine the collected data.



Based on the findings, an integrative model was designed comprising six core components: objectives, content, teaching strategies, teacher’s role, learner’s role, and assessment methods. The proposed model was validated by experts and demonstrated the potential to effectively combine content-based instruction with the cultivation of students’ thinking skills.



Furthermore, the model promotes dialogue-centered classrooms, enhances meaningful learning, and fosters active student participation. Given its flexibility, the model is adaptable to localized contexts and can be widely implemented in concept-oriented subjects in primary education. It can also serve as a practical guide for teachers, curriculum designers, and teacher training programs seeking to integrate philosophical inquiry with pedagogical content knowledge in the classroom.

Keywords

Subjects

احمدی حسینیان‌نژاد، ف.، و شریعت کیایی، م. (۱۴۰۲). تاثیر آموزش تفکر انتقادی بر انعطاف پذیری شناختی، سرزندگی تحصیلی و خودپنداره تحصیلی در دانش آموزان دختر. پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، ۱۷(۶۲)، 98-110. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2023.401000.2990
چوبفروش‌زاده، آ.، صابری‌فرد، م.، محمدپناه، ع.، و شیروی، ا. (1402). اثربخشی آموزش فلسفه بر انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی و مهارت‌های استدلال در کودکان. مجله سلامت روان کودک، 10(1)، 107-93. https://doi.org/10.61186/jcmh.10.1.8
علی‌جانی، ن.، کریمی، ف.، و سعیدیان، ن. (۱۴۰۳). ارائه و اعتبارسنجی الگوی ارتقای مشارکت در دانش‌آموزان دوره ابتدایی. فصلنامة پژوهش‌ در نظام­های آموزشی، ۱۸(۶۷)، ۴۱-۵۸. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2025.510866.3302
فریدون‌نژاد، م. (۱۴۰۲). معرفی برنامه فلسفه برای کودکان (فبک یا P4C) و بررسی اثربخشی آن بر آموزش و پرورش کودکان. مطالعات و تحقیقات در علوم رفتاری، ۱(۱۵)، ۱-۲۰. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/2063643/
گل صنم‌لو، م.، نعیمی، ا.، خورسندی طاسکوه، ع.، و شریعتی، س. ص. (۱۴۰۰). طراحی الگوی معلم خوب با تکیه بر سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش. فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی بسیج، ۲۴(۹۰)، ۱۷۹-۲۲۲.  https://ensani.ir/fa/article/469686/
نویدیان، ا.، واحدی، ش.، بدری گرگری، ر.، و فتحی آذر، ا. (۱۴۰۰). تأثیر آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان بر انعطاف‌پذیری روان‌شناختی دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی با رویکرد مبتنی بر زمینۀ فرهنگی. پژوهش‌های کاربردی روان‌شناختی، ۱۲(۲) ۲۶۵-۲۸۲. https://doi.org/10.22059/JAPR.2021.297152.643523
Ahmadihosseinnejad, F. A., & Shariyatkiaei, M. (2023). The effect of critical thinking training on cognitive flexibility, academic vitality, and academic self-concept in female students. Research in Educational Systems, 17(62), 98-110.  (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2023.401000.2990
Alijani, N., Karimi, F., & Saeidian, N. (2025). Presentation and validation of a model for enhancing participation in elementary school students. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 18(67), 41-58. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/jiera.2025.510866.3302
Balcı, E., & Eryılmaz, R. (2024). The impact of Philosophy for Children (P4C) activities on enhancing the speaking skills of gifted students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1451532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451532
Chobforoshzadeh, A., Saberifard, M., Mohammadpanah, A., & Shiravi, A. (2013). The effectiveness of philosophy education on cognitive flexibility and reasoning skills in children. Journal of Child Mental Health, 10(1), 107-93. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.61186/jcmh.10.1.8
Faridoon Nejad, M. (2023). Introduction to Philosophy for Children Program (P4C) and investigation of its effectiveness on children's education. Studies and Research in Behavioral Sciences, 1(15), 1-20. (in Persian) https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/2063643/
Fields, D. (2022). What do young children think and feel about others who learn and behave differently to themselves, and can those thoughts and feelings be changed? (Doctoral dissertation, University of York). oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:31407
Gol Sanamloo, M., Naeimi, E., Khorsandi Taskooh, A., & Shariati, S. S. (2021). Designing a model of a good teacher based on the Fundamental Transformation Document of Education.  Basij Strategic Studies, 24(90), 179–222. (in Persian) https://ensani.ir/fa/article/469686/
Hollenstein, L., & Brühwiler, C. (2024). The importance of teachers’ pedagogical-psychological teaching knowledge for successful teaching and learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(4), 480-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2328042
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840272
Major, C. H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. JHU Press. https://www.vitalsource.com/products/teaching-online-claire-howell-major-v9781421416243
Navidian, A., Vahedi, S., Badri Gargari, R., & Fathi Azar, E. (2021). The effect of teaching philosophy for children on psychological flexibility of elementary school students with a culturally context-based approach. Psychological Research, 12(2), 265–282. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/JAPR.2021.297152.643523
O'Reilly, C., Devitt, A., & Hayes, N. (2022). Critical thinking in the preschool classroom-A systematic literature review. Thinking skills and creativity, 46, 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101110
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Tallman, M. (2023). What makes pedagogical content knowledge “pedagogical”? Reconnecting PCK to its Deweyan foundations. The Mathematics Educator, 31(1), 100-128. https://doi.org/10.63301/tme.v31i1.2852
Unal, U., & Gunes, G. (2024). The effect of Philosophy for Children (P4C) activities on the development of moral perception and social rules of preschool children. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/ 10.37291/2717638X.202452392
Wei, C., & Chen, L. (2025). The effects of philosophy for children on children’s cognitive development: A three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 13(10), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13100130