Journal of Research in Educational Systems
Scientific Journal

Provide a four-tier model for feasibility and effective deployment of good governance in higher education

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

reyhaneh pourhassan 1
Habibollah Salarzehi 2
Seyyed Aligholi Roshan 3
noor mohammad yaghoubi 3
Masood Dehghani 4

1 sistan and baloochestan university , zahedan , iran

2 Sisran and baloochestan university,zahedan,iran

3 Sistan and baloochestan university,zahedan,iran

4 Velayat university,iranshahr,iran

Abstract
The overall goal of the study was to provide a four-tier model of feasibility and effective deployment of good governance in higher education. The research method of the present study is meta-synthesis and revision of the subject. The findings of relevent qualitative and quantitative research were combined and the present model was designed. A total of 298 articles in the field of good governance in education were evaluated, and at the end, 60 studies were selected and by analyzing their content, the relevant dimensions and codes were extracted and the importance and priority of each was determined using Shannon entropy. The findings showed that the codes for continuous financial reporting, managing the process of change in education and research based on environmental changes, flexibility in law enforcement, the legitimacy of authority, mastery of curriculum, teaching experience, having skilled staff, removing barriers Access to education, efforts to create the right environment for raising public awareness, and coordination among stakeholders among the three dimensions of good governance are most important. The four-step model presented in the present study enables the transition from the current situation to the optimal one for establishing good governance effectively.

Keywords

Keywords: higher education
good governance
Meta-synthesis approach
آذر، ع.، غلامرضایی، د.، دانایی‏‏فرد، ح. و خداداد حسینی، ح. (1393). تحلیل پویای ارتباط صنعت و دانشگاه در خطّ‏مشی‏‏های آموزش عالی برنامۀ پنجم توسعه با رویکرد پویایی سیستم، مجلۀ چشم‏‏انداز مدیریت صنعتی، 3 (9)، 79-115.
احمدی رضایی، ح.، اجتهادی، م.، قورچیان، ن. و محمدداودی، ا. (1396). ارزیابی وضعیت حاکمیت خوب دانشگاهی با استقلال سازمانی و قابلیت پاسخگویی، مجلۀ مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی، 8 (29)، 179-202.
افخمی روحانی، ح.، رحمان سرشت، ح. و مرجانی، ش. (1394). حکمرانی دانشگاهی و ارزیابی پرتال‏‏ها و وب‏‏گاه‏‏ها، نامۀ آموزش عالی، 7 (28)، 75-96.
امیری ‏‏فرح‏آبادی، ج.، ابوالقاسمی، م. و قهرمانی، م. (1395). آسیب‏‏شناسی فرایند سیاست‏‏پژوهی در نظام آموزش عالی ایران، فصلنامۀ مطالعات میان‏‏رشته‏‏ای در علوم انسانی، 8 (4)، 139-171.
حبیب‏‏پور، ک. و صفری، ر. (1388). راهنمای جامع کاربرد SPSSدر تحقیقات پیمایشی. تهران: لویه، متفکران.
رجائی، ا. (1396). بررسی وضعیت حکمرانی در بخش آموزش از منظر نظام ارتباطی آن در کشورهای جهان، فصلنامۀ علمی-ترویجی سیاست‏‏نامۀ علم و فناوری، 7 (4)، 26-34.
روشن، ا. و متوسلی، م. (1397). الگوی ذی‏‏نفع‏‏مداری مبتنی‏‏بر حکمرانی خوب برای ارتقای کیفیت وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، فصلنامۀ پژوهش در نظام‏های آموزشی، 12 (41)، 81-100.
زمانی، ا. (1395). تحلیل کیفی اصول مستندسازی تجارب سازمانی رؤسای دانشگاه: گامی در جهت ارزش‏‏آفرینی تجربۀ سازمانی، فصلنامۀ پژوهش در نظام‏‏های آموزشی، 10 (35)، 201-228.
شجاعی، م. و دُرتاج، ف. (1395). رابطۀ درگیری شناختی با هیجان‏‏های پیشرفت و خودنظم‏‏جویی تحصیلی در دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد. فصلنامۀ پژوهش در نظام‏‏های آموزشی، 10 (34)، 85-108.
کمالی، ی. (1394). روش‏‏شناسی فراترکیب و کاربرد آن در سیاست‏گذاری عمومی، فصلنامۀ سیاست، 47 (3)، 721-736.
محقر، ع.، جعفرنژاد، ا.، مدرس‏‏یزدی، م. و صادقی‏‏مقدم، م. (1392). ارائۀ الگوی جامع هماهنگی اطلاعاتی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، مجلۀ مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 5 (4)، 161-194.
میرسپاسی، ن.، داداش‏‏کریمی، ی. و نجف‏‏بیگی، ر. (1398). طراحی مدل حکمرانی آموزش عالی کشور، فصلنامۀ مدیریت سازمان‏‏های دولتی، 7 (3)، 12-28.
Afkhami Rouhani, H., Rahman Seresht, H., & Marjani, Sh. (2015). Academic governance and evaluation of portals and websites, Higher Education Letter, 7(28), 75-96. (In Persian).
Ahmadi Rezaei, H., Ejtehadi, M., Ghourchiyan, N., & Mohammad Davoodi, A. (2017). Assess the status of good academic governance with organizational independence and accountability, Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 8(29), 179-202. (In Persian).
Amiri Farahabadi, J., Abolghasemi, M., & Ghahremani, M. (2016). Pathology of the policy research process in the Iranian Higher Education System, Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 8(4), 139-171. (In Persian).
Åse, G., Peter, M., & Harry, D. (2017). Change in university governance structures in continental Europe, higher education quarterly, 3(71), 1-16.
Azar, A., Gholamreza, D., & Khodad Hosseini, H. (2014). Dynamic Analysis of Industry-University Relationship in Higher Education Policies of the Fifth Development Plan with System Dynamics Approach, Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 3(9), 79-115. (In Persian).
Chan, S. J., & Yang, C. Y. (2018). Governance styles in Taiwanese universities: Features and effects, International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 29-35.
Chappell, C. D. (2013). The Virginia Commission on Higher Education Board Appointments: The Impact of Legislative Reform on Public University Governance, ProQuest LLC, D.A. Dissertation, George Mason University.
Dietmar, B. (2013). Changing Governance Models in Higher Education: The Case of the New Managerialism, Swiss Political Science Review, 5(3), 1-24.
Dill, D. (2017). Academic Governance: A US Perspective on External, Internal, and Collegial Models. In Sendai, JAHER Annual Conference Symposium.
Eurydice, S. (2016). Higher Education Governance in Europe: Policies، Structures, Funding and Academic Staff, Belgium: EURYDICE European Unit.
HabibPour, K., & Safari, R. (2009). Comprehensive guide to the use of SPSS in survey research, Tehran: Louyeh, Motafakeran. (In Persian).
Henard, F. & Mitterle, A. (2014). Governance and Quality Guidelines in Higher Education: A review of governance arrangements and quality assurance. Berlim: OECD.
Hery, H., Muljo, A., Wicaksono, I., & Edward, R. (2014). Optimalisasi penerapan prinsip good governance bidang akademik dalam upaya mewujudkan good university governance, binus business review, 5(1), 91-100.
Huang, F. (2018). University governance in China and Japan: Major findings from national surveys. International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 12-19.
Israr, A. (2014). Improving Higher Educational Management through Good Governance, Journal of Education and Practice, 23(5), 167-17.
John, D. (2013). The deadly dull issue of university administration? Good governance, managerialism and organizing academic work, higher education policy, 11, 59-79.
Kamali, Y. (2015). The methodology of meta-synthesis and implications for public policy, Politic Quarterly, 47(3), 721-736. (In Persian).
Meehan, E. M. (2003(. From Government to Governance, Civic Participation and 'new Politics': The Context of Potential Opportunities for the Better Representation of Women. Centre for Advancement of Women in Politics, Queen's University Belfast.
Mirsepasi, N., Dadashkarimi, Y., & Najafbeygi, R. (2019). Designing a model of governing higher education in the country, Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 7(3), 12-28. (In Persian).
Mohaghar, A., JafarNezhad, A., Modarres Yazdi, M., & SadeghiMoghaddam, M. (2013). Provide a comprehensive model of information coordination using the meta-combined method, Journal of Information Technology Management, 5(4), 161-194. (In Persian).
Munawir, M., Raharjo, K., Djalil, M., Syahputra, H., Muslim, B., & Adam, M. (2019). Dimensions of identity strength and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in establishing good university governance and performance of religious ideology-based higher educations, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 250-272.
Perkins, J. (1990). The Governance of Higher Education in Spain, Higher Education Policy, 3, 25–27
Rajaei, A. (2017). The Study of the Governance of the Education Sector in Terms of Its Communication System in Different Countries of the World, Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 7(4), 26-34. (In Persian).
Rowshan, A., & Motevasseli, M. (2018). Stakeholder model based on good governance to improve the quality of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12(41), 81-100. (In Persian).
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Toward a Metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women, Research in nursing & health, 26(2), 153-170.
Shojaei, M., & Dortaj, F. (2016). The relationship between cognitive conflict and academic excellence and academic self-management in undergraduate students, Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 10(34), 85-108. (In Persian).
Yáñez, S., Uruburu, Á., Moreno, A., & Lumbreras, J. (2019). The sustainability report as an essential tool for the holistic and strategic vision of higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 57-66.
Yonezawa, A. (2014). The Academic Profession and University Governance Participation in Japan: Focusing on the Role of Kyoju-kai. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 8, 19-31.
Yousaf, M, Freeha, I. & Abida, i). 2016). Exploring the impact of good governance on citizens' trust in Pakistan، Government Information Quarterly, 33, 200-209.
Zaman, K. (2015). Quality guidelines for good governance in higher education across the Globe، Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1-7.
Zamani, A. (2016). Qualitative analysis of the principles of documenting the organizational experiences of university deans: a step towards value creation of organizational experience, Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 10(35), 201-228. (In Persian).
Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts، Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3), 311–318.

Home

Editorial Boards

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us