Journal of Research in Educational Systems
Scientific Journal

Developing a Model for Identifying Factors Affecting Organizational Agility and Its Status in Farhangian University (Case Study: Khorasan Razavi Province)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

raziye mansornia 1
mahmod safari 2
masome oladian 3

1 PhD Student, Educational Sciences, Educational Management Tendency, Damavand Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Educational Sciences, Islamic Philosophy of Education, Damavand Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Curriculum Development Philosophy, Damavand Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Iran

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors affecting organizational agility for model modeling in Khorasan Razavi Cultural University. The main method of this study is survey method which was done by questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS software, LISREL software and various statistics. In Khorasan Razavi Cultural University, according to the statistics of Khorasan Razavi Planning Organization, there were 337 people. Using Krejcie and Morgan table (1970), 181 stratified random sampling was selected as the subjects. That is, in order to further generalize and avoid The sample size of 200 questionnaires was distributed among 200 subjects. Statistical data were distributed to 200 subjects. Data collected through maxqda software in qualitative section and interview analysis, effective factors were determined and then finalized on the basis of confirmatory factor analysis. It is also influenced by agility factors at university including: organizational factors (structure, delegation, organizational culture); strategic factors (quality improvement, teaching and research policies, technology development); human factors (managers, staff, faculty) Are . Thus, while developing the final model of organizational agility at Khorasan Razavi Khorasan University, the degree of fitness of the proposed model was determined and its fit was approved. The results of t-test also showed that the status of components and dimensions of organizational agility in Farhangian University is in desirable condition.

Keywords

Organizational agility
speed
competence
responsiveness
flexibility
ابراهیمیان جلودار، س. ی. و ابراهیمیان جلودار، س. م. (1390). چابکی سازمانی، سرعت پاسخگویی و انعطاف پذیری سازمانی، توسعه‏یانسانیپلی، 39(2)، 61-77.
آذر، ع.، ، نقوی، س. ع. و اسعدیان، م. (1394). در تحقیقی با عنوان اولویت بندی عوامل توانمندساز چابکی سازمانی در دانشگاه‏ها و مراکز آموزش عالی شهر یزد؛ فصلنامهپژوهشوبرنامهریزیدرآموزشعالی، 21(1)، 41-56.
. جوانمردی، م.، کرباسیان، م.، خبوشانی، الف. و زنجیرچی، م. (1390). طراحی یک رویکرد تلفیقی از الگوی ساختار تفسیری (ISM) و AHP-TOPSIS فازی برای انتخاب و رتبه بندی تأمین کنندگان چابک. مدیریت تولید و عملیات، 2(1)، 34-107.
خاوری، ع.، آراسته، ح. و جعفری، پ. (1397). تأثیر فن آوری اطلاعات بر قابلیت‏های چابکی دانشگاهی، فنآوریاطلاعاتوارتباطاتدرعلومتربیتی، 1(2)، 36-44.
عباس پور، ع.، آقازاده، ا. و باقری کراچی، ا. (1391). طراحی الگوی مطلوب دستیابی به چابکی سازمانی در دانشگاهها. فصلنامهمطالعاتمدیریت (بهبودوتحول)، 22(39).
محمدی، ج.، ودادهیر، الف. و محمدی، ف. (1391). «مناسبات سرمایۀ فرهنگی و سبک زندگی»، مجلۀ جامعه‏شناسی ایران، 13(4)، 1-23.
Amirnejad, G., Memarzadeh, G., & Amirnejad, F. (2015). The Inflntial Factors in Organization Agility of Employees of South Oil Company. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 5(1), 49-56.
Baker, V. R. (2017), Debates—Hypothesis testing in hydrology: Pursuing certainty versus pursuing uberty, Water Resour. Res, 53, 1770– 1778, doi:10.1002/2016WR020078.
Basol, E., & Dogerlioglu, O. (2014). Structural Determinants of Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 2014, 1-13.
Chen, J., Wang, D., & Pan, S. (2011). Understaning Organizational Agility Development for Government– A Proccess Model of Resource Configuration. PACIS 2011 Proceedings, 42.
Doz, Y. I., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic Agility Long: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range planning, 43(2-3), 370-382.
Dries, N., Vantilborgh, T., & Pepermans, R. (2012). The role of learning agility and career variety in the identification and development of high potential. Personnel Review, 41(3), 1-25.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Nikpour, A., & Berkam, Y. (2012). Organizational agility and achieve an agile organization model. Jasmine strategy. 1 (30): 151-71.
Qin, R., & Nembhard, D. A. (2010). Workforce agility for stochastically diffused conditions-A real options perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2), 324-334.
Ramesh, G., & Devadasan S. R. (2007). Literature Review on the Agile Manufacturing Criteria. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(2), 182-201.
Raschke, R. (2010). Process-based view of agility: The value contribution of IT and the effects on process outcomes. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(4), 279-313.
Saha, N., Gregar, A., & Saha, P. (2017). Organizational agility and HRM strategy. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6, 323-334.
Presenting a Model to Identify Factors Affecting Organizational Agility and Its Status in Farhangian University (Case Study: Khorasan Razavi Province)
Journal of Research in Educational Systems
Volume 14, Special Issue
Summer 2020
Pages 509-524

Home

Editorial Boards

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us