Journal of Research in Educational Systems
Scientific Journal

Providing a Model for Ethical Education of High School Students in Mazandaran Province (Case Study: Mazandaran Province Education)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

fatemeh mosadeghinik 1
javad soleimanpor 2
mahnaz jalalvand 3

1 PhD student of philosophy of education at Arak Azad University

2 Assistant Professor of Educational Sciences Azad University Tonekabon Branch, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Educational Sciences, Arak Azad University, Iran

Abstract
The overall purpose of the study is to provide a model of moral education for secondary school students, based on a descriptive research method. The statistical population includes 15156 teachers and managers of secondary education and training in Mazandaran province and 75 teachers of educational sciences in universities of this province. A random stratified sampling method was used to estimate the sample size of 300 teachers and experts. The data gathering tool after extracting the components of moral education from the perspective of the great philosophers of schools, has produced a questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.973. The sampling adequacy of the KMO method was estimated to be 0.943. The data analysis method is exploratory factor analysis with the aim of finding the present variables and confirmatory factor analysis by fitting the final model. The findings indicate that by confirming the performance of factor analysis with the proof of Bartlett's Spearman test, the results of factor analysis showed that this scale was sufficiently valid and saturated with 3 factors, the first factor (wisdom with 23 items). Ethical education with the most factor loaded with 83/80 and the second factor with 16 items with 11.46 and the third factor with 16 items with 4.74 which according to the needs of the statistical population were modeled. Three factors are recommended in students' moral training.

Keywords

Moral Education
Ethical Principles
Secondary School
افکاری ف. (1393). نقد و بررسی رویکردهای تربیت اخلاقی در دوره ابتدایی در کتاب‏های درسی بخوانیم، بنویسم، قرآن، هدیه‏های آسمان، تعلیمات اجتماعی و طراحی الگوی برنامه‏درسی، پایانامه دکترای تخصصی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی.
باقری خ. (1386). نو عمل‏گرایی و فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
خسروی ز، باقری خ. (1387). راهنمای درونی کردن ارزش‏های اخلاقی از طریق برنامه‏درسی، فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه‏درسی؛ 8(3): 105-81.
رحیمی ح، شکاری ع، فربا م. (1393). آسیب‏شناسی تربیت اخلاقی از منظر برنامه‏درسی پنهان، فصلنامه علمی- ترویجی اخلاق؛ 15(4): 204-177.
سلحشور ا. (1390). حدود و ثغور تربیت اخلاقی، تربیت معنوی و تربیت دینی، فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی؛ 2(2): 41.
سلیمانپور ج. (1388). مهارت‏های تدریس نوین، تهران: نشر احسن.
شاملی ع ع، ملکی ح، کاظمی ح ر. (1390). برنامه‏درسی برای نیل به ترتیب اخلاقی، تهران، فصلنامه اسلام و پژوهش‏های تربیتی؛ 2(3): 17.
فرمهینی فراهانیم، میرزا محمدیم ح، امیرسالاری ع. (1388). بررسی تربیت اخلاقی از منظر امام صادق (ع)، مجله دانشور؛ (16): 65-39.
کریم‏زاده ک. (1387). بررسی مقایسه‏ای رابطه شاخصه‏های تربیت اخلاقی با مولفه‏های ادراک خود در نوجوانان عادی و دارای مشکل، فصلنامه تربیت اسلامی؛ 6(3): 160-123.
منصورم. (1378). روان‌شناسی ژنتیک (تحول روانی از تولد تا پیری)، تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی (سمت).
Baghgoli H. (2010). Criticism on the religious Education methods Mashhad: Publication of astan ghods razavi.
Beyens U, Yu H, Han T, Zhang L, Zhou X. (2015). The strength of a remorseful heart: Psychological and neural basis of how apology emolliates reactive aggression and promotes forgiveness. Frontiers in psychology; 6(2): 16111634-.
 Blair R J R. (2007). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences; 11(9): 387–392.
Bostyn D H, Roets A. (2017). Trust, trolleys and social dilemmas: A replication study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General; 146(5): 1–7.
 Buckholtz J W. (2015). Social norms, self-control, and the value of antisocial behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences; 3(2): 122–129.
Chi- Ming Lee A. (2004). Changes and challenges for moral education in Taiwan. Journal of moral education; 33(4): 575 – 595.
Everett J A, Faber N S, Savulescu J, Crockett M J. (2018). The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology; 79: 200–216.
Everett J A, Pizarro D A, Crockett M J. (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General; 145(6): 772–787.
Giner-Sorolla R, Chapman H A. (2017). Beyond purity: Moral disgust toward bad character. Psychological Science; 28(1): 80–91.
Graham J R. (2011). The MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (5th ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
Han H, Kim J, Jeong C, Cohen G L. (2017). Attainable and relevant moral exemplars are more effective than extraordinary exemplars in promoting voluntary service engagement. Frontiers in Psychology; 8: 283.
Helzer E G, Critcher C R. (2018). What do we evaluate when we evaluate moral character? In K. Gray, & J. Graham (Eds), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 99–107). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kerjcie R V, Morgan D W. (1976) Determining sample size for Research Activities, Educational and Psychological Measurement; 30: 607 –610.
Sanger M, Osguthorpe R. (2005). Making sense of approaches to moral education. Journal of moral education; 34(1): 57–71.
Yu H, Gao X, Zhou Y, Zhou X. (2018). Decomposing gratitude: Representation and integration of cognitive antecedents of gratitude in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience; 38: 4886–4898.
Journal of Research in Educational Systems
Volume 14, Special Issue
Summer 2020
Pages 585-609

Home

Editorial Boards

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us