Presenting an appropriate model of effective factors on quality of education in primary schools of Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Educational Management, Department of Educational Management, Rooden Department, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Roodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Roodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roodehen, Iran

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to present a suitable model of effective factors on educational quality in elementary schools in Tehran. The purpose of the study was applied in terms of data analysis and mixed analytical exploratory research. As a method, descriptive and survey type were included in the quantitative section of Tehran's elementary school principals comprising 907 individuals out of which 269 were selected by simple cluster and relative stratified sampling. The research instrument consisted of a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of 125 items. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed. Also in the qualitative part of the research, 15 experts were interviewed based on semi-structured interview with 5 questions. The results showed that structural equation modeling consisted of three main components and 12 sub-components such as: 1- management factors (principals' attention to extracurricular activities, principals' attention to teachers' teaching and continual performance appraisal) 2- organizational factors, including (attention to selection). Teachers, attention to teacher empowerment, attention to educational content, formulation and adjustment of applicable rules, allocation of appropriate annual budgets and updating of educational facilities and equipment) 3- skill factors included (attention to teachers verbal skills, attention to non-verbal teachers skills and attention to teachers educational skills) Components of educational quality are Be it. Also absolute / relative fitness indices such as NFI, NNFI, CFI, IFI, RFI, GFI, AGFI, NDI and CDI with values ​​of 0.92, 0.94, 0.96, 0.96, 0.89, 0.94, 90 0.94 and 0.93 which have good fit

Keywords


توفیقی، ش.؛ صادقی فر، ج.؛ حموزاده، پ.؛ افشاری، س.؛ فروزان فر، ف.؛ تقوی شهری، س. (1390). کیفیت خدمات آموزشی از دیدگاه دانشجویان؛ مدل سروکوال. دوماهنامه علمی- پژوهشی راهبردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 4(1)، 26-21.
خطیبی، ا.؛ سجادی، ن. و سیف پناهی، ج. (1390). مطالعه کیفیت خدمات آموزشی دانشکده تربیت بدنی مدرسه تهران از دیدگاه دانش آموزیان کارشناسی. مطالعاتمدیریتورزشی، 8(94)، 94-77.
زاهد بابلان، ع. (1391). میزان همخوانی روابط کلامی و غیر کلامی معلمان در جریان تدریس و ارتباط آن با پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش آموزان. مجله روان‌شناسی مدرسه، 1(46)، 16-1.
شهرکی پور، ح. (1391). عوامل مؤثر بر افزایش کیفیت آموزشی دوره‏های کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه آزاد دانشکده علوم تربیتی (مطالعه موردی واحد رودهن). پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی، 2(7)، 124-118.
صالحی، ک.؛ زین آبادی، ح. و کیامنش، ع. (1396). نگاهی تحلیلی بر عملکرد هنرستانهای کار و دانش. موردی از ارزشیابی کیفیت بروندادهای هنرستانهای کار و دانش منطقة 2 شهر تهران. فصلنامة نوآوری‏های آموزشی، 5(16)، 163-119.
طلوع دل، م.؛ و امینی فر، ز. (1395). بررسی متغیرهای آسایش محیطی با تأکید بر ارتقاء کیفیت یادگیری در فضاهای آموزشی. نشریه علمی پژوهشی فناوری آموزش، 1(11)، 9-1.
میرغفوری، ح.؛ شعبانی، آ.؛ محمدی، خ.؛ ومنصوری محمدآبادی، س (1395). شناسایی و رتبه بندی عوامل مؤثر بر بهبود کیفیت خدمات آموزشی با استفاده از (ISM) رویکرد تلفیقی ویکور فازی و مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری. آموزشوارزشیابی، 10(43)، 33-13.
A. Alzamil, Z. (2014). Quality improvement of technical education in Saudi Arabia: self-evaluation perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 22(2), 125-144.
Asli Lidice, Gokturk Saglam (2016). Using studen evaluations to measure educational quality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,70, 1009 – 1015.
Harman, X. (2012). Big moves to improve the quality of teacher education in China. On the Horizon, 20(4), 324-335.
Hunter, R. C (2011). Public School Desegregation and Education Facilities. School Business Affairs, 2(77), 24-26.
Khatibi, A; Sajjadi, N & Sef Panahi, J. (2011). Study of the quality of educational services of Tehran School of Physical Education from the point of view of undergraduate students. Sports Management Studies. Eighth, Spring, 94, 77-94.
Belliaa, L; Spadaa, G; Pedacea, b; Fragliassoa,F (2018). Methods to evaluate lighting quality in educational environments. Energy Procedia, 78, 3138 – 3143.
Lee, c. (2010). The Effect of Learning Motivation, Total Quality Teaching and Peer-Assisted Learning on Study Achievement: Empirical Analysis from Vocational Universities or Colleges’ students in Taiwan. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 6(2), 56-73.
Mitra Debnath, R., & Shankar, R. (2012). Improving service quality in technical.
Niculescu, M (2015). The Quality of the Educational Process via Classroom Leadership. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 885 – 891.
Olga, V; Yanuschika, E; Pakhomovaa, G; Batbold, Kh (2015). E-learning as a Way to Improve the Quality of Educational for International Students. International Conference for International Education and Cross-cultural Communication. Problems and Solutions (IECC), Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com.
Tsinidou, M; Gerogiannis, V &Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the Factors that Determine Quality in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(3), 227-244.
Vandiver, B (2011). The Impact of School Facilities on the Learning Environment. ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University.
Varesi, Sh. (2010).Assessing educational facilities and providing various human improvement programs in nursing headquarters of educational hospitals, affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Master Theses in Nursing. Tehran: Tehran Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Zahed Babelan, A. (2012). The degree of consistency between the verbal and nonverbal relationships of teachers in the teaching process and its relationship with students' academic achievemen. Journal of Psychological Studies, 1(1), 46-61.