Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Educational Administration, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran

2 Professor, Administration Education Dept., University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Administration Education Dept., University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to Designing and validation the Pattern of Effective factors on the realization of the student voice from the Administrators' perspective in Elementary schools In the academic year 1399-1400 in the city of Qom with the mixed method research. In the qualitative section, 15 exemplary Administrators with more than 15 years of teaching experience, selected by purposive sampling method to achieve theoretical saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured and in-depth interviews and analyzed by inductive content analysis with coding at three levels: open, axial and selective that Its face and content validity was confirmed by 4 professors and for agreement, the agreement method between the two coders was used. Regarding the components of student voice, finally 5 main categories including Value based Management, Insight, Distributed leadership, Top Management and Middle Management student voice with 31 open codes and 7 selection codes were obtained. The quantitative part also included 160 Administrator who was the available sampling method was used. In such cases, 5 people is the desired value for each item of the questionnaire. Data were collected by a researcher-made questionnaire with 31 items with convergent validity above 0.50 and combined reliability of 0.90. In model validation, Quantitative data analysis by first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis indicates the necessary accuracy of indicators to measure factors. Finally It can be said Focusing more on listening to the student voice acts as a catalyst for change in schools and for improving the school management.

Keywords

تیلور، ر. و آرسانستین، ک. (2017). سقلمه، بهبود تصمیمات، ترجمه مهری مدآبادی (1397). تهران: هورمزد.
حیدری، ا. و مرزوقی، ر. (1391). بررسی و مقایسه سبک‏های عمومی تصمیم‌گیری در مدیران دانشگاه مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه شیراز. رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 3(12)، 67-84.‎
رابینز، ا. پ. و جاج، ت. ای. (2009). رفتار سازمانی. ترجمه مهدی زارع. (1394). نشر: نص.
‎سلیمانی، ن.، ابراهیمی، م. و شفیع‌زاده، ح. (1399). ارائه الگویی برای مدیریت غیرمتمرکز در آموزش‌وپرورش بر اساس یک نظریه داده بنیاد. نشریه پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، 14(ویژه‌نامه)، 255-269.
سیاهکل رودی، م. (1394). طراحی مدل تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی در دانشگاه پیام نور. رساله دکتری دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز.
شیرازی، ع. (1392). مدیریت آموزشی تئوری. تحقیق و کاربرد. تهران: مهربان نشر.
ضامنی، ف.، اندرامی، ع؛ و ترانه. (1399). رابطه ادراک از سیاست سازمانی و مدیریت مسیر شغلی با فلات شغلی (به‌منظور ارائه مدل). پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی، 14(ویژه‌نامه)، 225-238.
عباس پور، ع. (1382). شأن تصمیم‌گیری در مدیریت: در جستجوی درک مدل‏ها و پارادایم‏های تصمیم‌گیری سازمانی. کمال مدیریت، (2و3)، 29-56.
فرهنگی، ع. ‏ا.، شاه میرزایی، و. و حسین زاده، ع. (1395). نظریه‏پردازان و مشاهیر مدیریت. تهران: مهربان نشر.
کرسول، ج. د. (2007). پژوهش کیفی و طرح پژوهش. ترجمه حسن دانایی‏فرد و حسین کاظمی (1396). تهران: صفار.
مقیمی، س. م. (1394). مبانی سازمان و مدیریت. تهران: راه دان.
میر کمالی، س. م. (1393). رهبری و مدیریت آموزشی. تهران: یسطرون.
نجفی، ع. (1386). تصمیم‌گیری سازمانی. کارگاه تصمیم‌گیری سازمانی. تهران: سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
References
Abdillah, A. Nusantara, T. Subanj, S. Susanto, H. & Abadyo, A. (2016). The Students Decision Making in Solving Discount Problem. International Education Studies; 9(7), 57.
Abrar, M. & Ahmad Baig, S. (2018). Brig Handbook of Methods & Research in Effective Management Decision Making. London: Brig Academics.
Baker, D. F. (2017). Teaching Empathy and Ethical Decision Making in Business Schools. Journal of Management Education, 1–24.
Ceschi, A., Costantini, A., Sartori, R., Weller, J. & Di Fabio, A. (2019). Dimensions of decision-making: an evidence-based classification of heuristics and biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 188-200.
Creelman, D. (2012). Mintzberg’s refreshing view of leadership. Decision Processes, 75(2), 93-116.
Derakhshan, R., Turner, R., & Mancini, M. (2019). Project governance and stakeholders: A literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 37(1), 98–116.
De Sordi, J. O. de Paulo, W. L. Bitencourt Jorge, C. F. da Silveira, D. B. Dias, J. A. & de Lima, M. S. (2021). Overcompliance and reluctance to make decisions: Exploring warning systems in support of public managers. Government Information Quarterly, 101592. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101592.
Tipton, E., Spybrook, J., Fitzgerald, K. G., Wang, Q., & Davidson, C. (2021). Toward a System of Evidence for All: Current Practices and Future Opportunities in 37 Randomized Trials. Educational Researcher, 50(3), 145-156.
Hollands, F., Pan, Y., & Escueta, M. (2019). What is the potential for applying cost-utility analysis to facilitate evidence-based decision making in schools?. Educational Researcher48(5), 287-295.
Farina, A. J. (2013). A mixed-method exploration of school organizational and social relationship factors that influence dropout-decision making in a rural high school. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Glover, T. A., Kettler, R. J., Reddy, L. A., & Kurz, A. (2019). Formative assessment approaches to inform teacher practices: Key considerations. Assessment for Effective Intervention44(2), 67-68.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research2(163-194), 105.
Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horner, R. H. & Halle, J. W. (2019). Implications of Emerging Educational Reforms for Individuals with Severe Disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 1–6.
Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2017). Organizational behavior for school leadership: Leveraging your school for success. Routledge.
Keung, C. (2018). The Effect of Shared Decision-Making on the Improvement in Teachers' Job Development. New horizons in Education, 56(3), 31-46.
Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 109-137.
Lin, C. S. (2016). Educating Students’ Privacy Decision Making through Information Ethics Curriculum. Creative Education, 7(01), 171.
Lumby, J. (2019). Distributed leadership and bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 5-19.
Maltempi, M. G. (2019). Principals' Perceptions of the Barriers and Impediments to Distribute Leadership and Share Decision Making under an Era of Heightened Accountability: An Exploratory Study Using Q-Technique. Long Island University, CW Post Center.
Marieke van Geel;Trynke Keuning; Adrie J. Visscher; Jean-Paul Fox. (2016). Assessing the Effects of a School-Wide Data- Based Decision-Making Intervention on Student Achievement Growth in Primary Schools. American Educational Research Journal; April 2016, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 360–394.
Miser, H. J. (1993). Operations Analysis in the Army Air Forces in World War II: Some Reminiscences. Interfaces, 23(5), 47-49.
Or, M. H., & Berkovich, I. (2021). Participative decision making in schools in individualist and collectivist cultures: The micro-politics behind distributed leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-21. 17411432211001364.
Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological bulletin132(2), 297.
Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education79, 111-123.
Plessner, H. & Czenna, S. (2008). The benefits of intuition. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making: 251-265. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Olayiwola, S., & Alabi, K. (2015). The Micropolitics of School Principals' Decision Making in Nigeria: Principals' Perspective. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management3(2), 173-191.
Özgenel, M. (2018). Modeling the relationships between school administrators’ creative and critical thinking dispositions with decision making styles and problem solving skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice18(3), 673-700.
Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of management36(4), 941-973.
Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2016). Ethical leadership and decision making in education applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Fourth edition. Routledge.
Sladek, J. (2017). A mixed methods study on educational leadership and ethical decision making in situations of high turbulence (Doctoral dissertation, Lindenwood University).
Resto, V. K. (2020). The Systems Thinker: How Principals Employ Systems-Level Thinking in Their Decision-Making and Its Potential Impact on Culture and Student Achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Sage Graduate School). Todd A.
Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education79, 111-123.
Torlak, N. G., Demir, A., & Budur, T. (2021). Decision-making, leadership and performance links in private education institutes. Rajagiri Management Journal.
Turner, R. (2020). How does governance influence decision making on projects and in project-based organizations?. Project Management Journal51(6), 670-684.
Valentine, D. N. (2016). How Do Parents Engage in School-Choice Decisions? (Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University).