explaining the concept of transformational curriculum in view of its application in developing creativity of students in Iranian educational system.

Foolady, Ahmad; Rahmani, Jahanbakhsh; Keshtiaray, Narges

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ curriculum Studies, Faculty of Educational Science, Islamic Azad University Isfahan(Khorasgan)

² Assistant Professor of Curriculum Studies,Faculty of Educational Science, Islamic Azad University Isfahan(Khorasgan)

³ Associate professor in curriculum, isfahan (khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study is explaining the concept of a transformative curriculum in order to Critique the education curriculum of Iran in 2019. In this study, qualitative research method of critical philosophical inquiry was used. The field of research has consisted of books, all articles and scientifically available print and digital resources related to the transformative curriculum from 1979 to 2019. Purposeful sampling method was used and the review of texts and documents related to the transformative curriculum was performed gradually and continued until theoretical saturation. By reviewing three paper and 10 chapters from different books, theoretical saturation was achieved. Information was collected using the "Document Review" tool. In the first and second steps, data were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis method of inductive categorization and thematic coding, and in the third step, the research was analyzed using the reflective method of data. The findings show that the transformed curriculum has six main assumptions: homogeneous and correlated. Comparing the assumptions of the changing curriculum based on the criterion of creativity showed that while converging its dimensions, curriculum as cosmology, fiction creativity, curriculum as complexity, tolerance of ambiguity, curriculum as dialogue, integration Rational thinking and narrative thinking, curriculum as a course, "becoming", curriculum as a community, relationships and curriculum as a set of students' learning experiences emphasize the antecedent and outstanding synchronization and are effective in improving creativity. The transformative curriculum is not predetermined, but a transformational reality.

Keywords

20.1001.1.23831324.1399.14.49.8.7

References

ادموند سی، ش. (1991). روش‌شناسی مطالعات برنامه درسی. ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی و همکاران. (1387). تهران: سمت.

خنیفر، ح.، رحمتی، م ح. و رستمی پور، ع. (1389). مبانی تحول بنیادین نظام آموزش‏وپرورش مبتنی بر دیدگاه: حضرت امام خمینی (ره)، مقام معظم رهبری حضرت آیت ا... خامنه‏ای مدظله‌العالی و صاحب‏نظران تعلیم و تربیت ایران. تهران: نورالثقلین.

شعبانی، م. ملکی، ح. عباس پور، ع. و سعدی پور، ا. (1397). طراحی مدل برنامه درسی مبتنی بر خلاقیت در دانشگاه سازمانی. پژوهش در برنامه‏ریزی درسی، 15(31)، 62-78.

شهرآرای، م. سیدان، ا. و فرزاد، و. (1381). تحلیل خلاقیت در کودکان: معرفی آزمون تفکر خلاق در عمل و حرکت، مجله روان‏شناسی و علوم تربیتی، 32 (2)، 191-213.

صالحی، م. (1395). دلالت‏های اندیشه ریزوماتیک ژیل دلوز بر پرورش تفکر خلاق. پایان‏نامهکارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده روان‏شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران.

طباطبایی، ز. و قلتاش، ع. (1394). بررسی میزان و انطباق سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‏وپرورش با شاخص‏های خلاقیت. اولین کنفرانس بین‌المللی علوم انسانی با رویکرد بومی ـ اسلامی و تأکید بر پژوهش‏های نوین.

طوطیان، ص.، مهرآرا، ا. و بیگدلی، م. (1397). بررسی رابطه بین ویژگی‏های شخصیتی با خلاقیت و عملکرد سازمانی منابع انسانی مدیران آموزش‏وپرورش منطقه 5 استان تهران. نشریه پژوهش در نظام‏های آموزشی، 12، 749-766.

قادری، م. (1391). عمل و نظریه در مطالعات برنامه درسی. تهران: آوای نور.

ملیح، س. ر. و شجاعی، ز. (1389). نقد و بررسی دیدگاه‏های اصلی رقیب در مورد مسئله‏ی بازگشت‏پذیری، پژوهش‏های فلسفی، 6(17)، 57-96.

میلر جی. پی. (1984). نظریه‏های برنامه درسی. ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی. (1379). تهران: سمت.

Doll Jr, W. E. (1986). Prigogine: A new sense of order, a new curriculum. Theory into practice, 25(1), 10-16.

Doll Jr, W. E. (1993). A Post-Modern Perspective On Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

Doll Jr, W. E. (2003). Modes of thought. In proceedings of the 2003 Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference, October 16-18, Edmonton Alberta.

Doll Jr, W. E. (2012). Complicity and the Culture of Curriculum. Complicity: An International Journal of Complicity and Education, 9(1), 10-29.

Edmund C.Sh. (1991). Methodology of Curriculum Studies. Translation by Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi, PhD et al. (1387). Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]

Gang, X. (2015). Doll’s Pedagogical Theory and Its Enlightement on British and American Literature Teaching. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 104-109.

Hernandez-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975-2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1-17.

Khannifer, H., Rahmati, M. H., &Rostamipour, A (2010). Basics of the fundamental development of the educational system based on Imam Khomeini and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, and Iranian educators viewpoints. Tehran: Noor-e-Sagalin. [In Persian]

Malih., S., R., & Shojaei., Z. (2010). Review of the main controversial views on the issue of irreversibility, philosophical research, 6(17), 57-96. [In Persian]

McManimon, S. K. (2019). Teaching and Research as Blurred Translating. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 34(2), 58-71.

Miller J. P. (1988). Theories of the curriculum, translation by Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]

Prigogin, I. (1996). The End of Certainty: Tim, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. New York: The Free Press.

Prigogin, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York: The Free Press.

Qaderi, M. (2012). Practice and theory in curriculum studies. Tehran: Avaye Noor. [In Persian]

Quinn, M. (2019). Complexifying curriculum studies, reflections on the generative and generous giftes of williame. Doll, JR. New York: Routledge.

Salehi M. (2016). Gilles Deleuze's Rismatic Thinking Impressions on the Development of Creative Thinking. Master's Thesis. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran. [In Persian]

Shabani, M., Maleki, H., Abbaspur, A., & Sadipur, E. (2018). Designing a creative based curriculum model in corporate university. Research in Curriculum Planning, 15(31), 62-78. [In Persian]

Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and Education. Journal of Creative Education, 1(3), 166-169.

Shahr Aray, M., Sidan A. & Farzad, V. (2001). Creativity analysis in children: Introducing the theory of creative thinking in action and movement. Journal of Psychology and Education, 32(2), 191- 213. [In Persian]

Stuever, N. (2009). Review Article a Post-Modem Perspective on Curriculum. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 87-90.

Tabatabai., Z. & Ghaltash., A. (2015). Study of the extent and adaptation of the document on the fundamental transformation of education with the indicators of creativity. The first international human sciences conference with a native-Islamic approach and an emphasis on modern research. [In Persian]

Tutian, S., Mehrara, A., & Bigdley, M. (1397). Study of he Relationship between Personality Traits and Creativity and Organizational Performance of Human Resources Educational Managers, Region 5, Tehran Province. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12, 749-766.

Varbelow, S. (2012). Instruction, Curriculum and Society: Iterations Based on The Idwas of Willam Doll. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 87-98.

White, D. G., & Levin, J. A. (2016). Navigating the Turbulent Waters of school reform Guided by Complexhty Theory. An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 13(1), 43-80.

explaining the concept of transformational curriculum in view of its application in developing creativity of students in Iranian educational system.

References

References

Volume 14, Issue 49 - Serial Number 49July 2020Pages 125-140

Volume 14, Issue 49 - Serial Number 49
July 2020
Pages 125-140