سیاستگذاری، برنامه ریزی و مدیریت آموزشی
ehsan parvin; Atefeh Rigi
Abstract
The aim of the current research is to critically examine the national system of monitoring and evaluation in Iran's higher education, which used a qualitative approach and a descriptive phenomenological method. The participants in the research included 16 university and research institute experts who ...
Read More
The aim of the current research is to critically examine the national system of monitoring and evaluation in Iran's higher education, which used a qualitative approach and a descriptive phenomenological method. The participants in the research included 16 university and research institute experts who are knowledgeable about the field of study. The purposeful sampling method was snowball type. In order to collect data, a semi-structured interview tool was used until theoretical saturation was reached, and in order to analyze the data, the content analysis method was performed with an inductive approach based on Granheim and Lundman's model. The results showed that the challenges of the national monitoring, evaluation and validation system in Iran's higher education system are six categories: the multiplicity of monitoring and evaluation institutions and the absence of a national institution and trustee for the monitoring and evaluation of universities, centers and institutions of higher education; lack of clear, specific and standard criteria for measuring, monitoring, evaluating and ranking universities; centralization in the evaluation of universities, institutes and higher education centers by the government; Academics' belief, trust and weak belief in the importance and benefits of monitoring and evaluation; Lack of a suitable and comprehensive database for evaluation and validation; Weakness of the culture of accountability, follow-up, demanding and evaluation in the higher education system were divided and finally political strategies were presented to improve the national system of monitoring and evaluation of higher education in Iran.
maryam hosseyni
Abstract
Academic burnout creates feelings of helplessness, irritability, and disappointment in students, which subsequently dwindles away their motivation, performance and academic achievement. Therefore, it is very important to identify the contributing factors to students’ academic burnout in order to ...
Read More
Academic burnout creates feelings of helplessness, irritability, and disappointment in students, which subsequently dwindles away their motivation, performance and academic achievement. Therefore, it is very important to identify the contributing factors to students’ academic burnout in order to provide strategies and solutions for reducing them. The objective of this study is to investigate the factors affecting academic burnout among students of state-run universities in Iran’s higher education system. In this study, the qualitative method of content analysis was used. The population of the study was comprised of two main groups (students and professors) of the state universities of Iran in 2017, which were identified by the snowball sampling method. After two semi-structured group interviews with students (21 persons) and professors (10 people) and 6 individual interviews with professors and 14 individual interviews with students of the country's higher education system, including 31 provinces in 1396, data saturation achieved. Obtained data were coded and classified by using conventional content analysis. The results of the research showed that the main components of the conceptual model of the contributing factors on academic burnout of the students are: inefficiency of education, cultural factors, scientific fraud, education economics, family problems, academic and behavioral weaknesses of faculty, infrastructure problems were supportive-motivational factors and personality traits. The findings of this study provide good results for helping policymakers, planners and educators of Iran's higher education system to reduce academic burnout among students.
VALI MOHAMMAD DARINI; ehsan namdar joyami
Abstract
The research aimed to evaluate the design and implementation of higher education privatization policies. To this end, strategies, programs, and policies of this section (design and implementation) were received according to interviews and documents (literature and background), proposing strategies for ...
Read More
The research aimed to evaluate the design and implementation of higher education privatization policies. To this end, strategies, programs, and policies of this section (design and implementation) were received according to interviews and documents (literature and background), proposing strategies for each section. This review was conducted using laboratory method and semi-structured interviews applying thematic content analysis. In this regard, factors involved in the privatization of (design and implementation) of higher education in the world and Iran were recognized at first, which were then categorized in 22 areas and recommendations were provided for each factor. Following that, the requirements for privatization of higher education in Iran in the section of design and implementation were presented and placed in eight general areas. In compliance with any required section in the design and implementation (policy and strategic, legal, financial and economic, research and educational, management and organizational, social and cultural, infrastructural and communication requirements), a section was designed and implemented as executive corrective strategies and recommendations. In the next stage, barriers to the design and implementation of these sections were categorized into six fields (i.e., legal, economic, political, administrative structural, educational, and cultural and social barriers), and corrective strategies were recommended to deal with the mentioned barriers.
HASAN DOLATI; abotalem motallebi
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explain the strategies and requirements of the resistance economy associated with the higher education system, which was carried out using the mixed method, In the qualitative section of 10 faculty members of the Universities of Mazandaran province, in June, 1395, they ...
Read More
The purpose of this study was to explain the strategies and requirements of the resistance economy associated with the higher education system, which was carried out using the mixed method, In the qualitative section of 10 faculty members of the Universities of Mazandaran province, in June, 1395, they selected by purposeful sampling, Data were collected from a semi-structured and individual interview in the qualitative section and a researcher-made questionnaire was used in the quantitative section. The method of analysis in the qualitative section was based on content analysis, the statistical population consisted of the visiting and professorial faculty members of the University of Marine Sciences, which was determined by Morgan's method. The sample size was 159, the results of the research indicate that the Resistance Economics Strategies have an impact on the Resistance economics requirements. Also, the requirements of a Resistance economy have an impact on the realization of the Resistance economic consequences.
