salime golabgir; ali maghol; naziya sadat naseri; moslem cherabin
Volume 14, Issue 48 , April 2020, , Pages 59-74
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop and design a model of organizational excellence in Northeast Iran University of Culture in 1398 which was conducted using a mixed (quantitative, qualitative) and exploratory approach. The study population consisted of two groups. Qualitative department, scientific ...
Read More
The purpose of this study was to develop and design a model of organizational excellence in Northeast Iran University of Culture in 1398 which was conducted using a mixed (quantitative, qualitative) and exploratory approach. The study population consisted of two groups. Qualitative department, scientific community experts, Quantity of all invited faculty members, managers and deputies of Farhangian University based on Statistics Management Planning Organization of Khorasan Razavi, North and South provinces 732 persons. 302 people Nor were selected based on Morgan table to complete the questionnaire. To gather data in a quantitative section, a researcher-made questionnaire of organizational excellence was used, consisting of two main dimensions and two sub-dimensions of five empowerment criteria (leadership, policy and strategy, human resources, other resources and partnerships, processes) and four outcome measures (customer outcomes). , Staff results, performance results, community outcomes) were extracted from the results of qualitative interviews. To analyze the qualitative data, Grounded Theory method and t-test were used for significance of the relationship between variables. In this study, the value of t-dimensions of organizational excellence is estimated from 0.5 to 0.5 which is calculated more than the assumed t value (0.5). Therefore, considering the significance and positive of this coefficient, it can be stated that all the above dimensions have a positive and direct effect on it. The highest value for t is related to the principles of management and deployment, and the least to the satisfaction and motivation of employees.
Mehdi Kaffash; Farshideh Zameni
Volume 12, Special Issue , June 2018, , Pages 489-507
Abstract
This study aims to present a model model for starting the effects of the effect of spiritual leadership and resiliency on the organizational excellence and making priority among the faculty members in Khorasan Razavi Azad Universities. The survey type of descriptive research method was used ...
Read More
This study aims to present a model model for starting the effects of the effect of spiritual leadership and resiliency on the organizational excellence and making priority among the faculty members in Khorasan Razavi Azad Universities. The survey type of descriptive research method was used to conduct the research. The study population included all faculty members of Islamic Azad University of Khorasan Razavitotally1,200 people that 291 of them were selected randomly as sample using Morgan table.The required datawere gatheredthrough three standardized questionnaire including Spiritual Leadership Questionnaire byFry et. al (2005), Corner Davidson Resilience Scale (2003) and Muller’s organizational excellence questionnaire (2000) .The validity of the questionnaires was approved by the respective authors due to their standardization.The reliability of the instruments was calculated 94% for spiritual leadership questionnaire, 87% for Resiliencequestionnaire and83% for organizational excellencequestionnaire using Cronbach's alpha.Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics (T-test, Friedman) were used for data analysis. the prioritizing thevariable dimensions showed that faith has the highest rank in the spiritual leadership and outlook dimensions, meaningfulness, performance feedback, membership and love to altruism come after that respectively.In terms ofresiliency, dimensions of positive acceptance of change and safe relationship had the highest rank, while the dimensions of the notion of individual merit, control, trustingindividual instincts and spiritual influences were next in rank respectively.In the case of Excellence, leadership dimension hadthe highest rank, then the dimensions of customer results, society results, policy and strategy, key performance results, processes, employees and business partners and employee’s results were highest in rank respectively.
